Albert Einstein
The Derivation of E=mc2
Perhaps
the most famous equation of all time is E = mc2. The equation is a
direct result of the theory of special relativity, but what does it mean and
how did Einstein find it? In short, the equation describes how energy and mass
are related. Einstein used a brilliant thought experiment to arrive at this
equation, which we will briefly review here.
First
of all, let us consider a particle of light, also known as a photon. One of the
interesting properties of photons is that the have momentum and yet have no
mass. This was established in the 1850s by James Clerk Maxwell. However, if we
recall our basic physics, we know that momentum is made up of two components:
mass and velocity. How can a photon have momentum and yet not have a mass?
Einstein’s great insight was that the energy of a photon must be equivalent to
a quantity of mass and hence could be related to the
momentum.
Einstein’s thought experiment runs as follows. First, imagine a
stationary box floating in deep space. Inside the box, a photon is emitted and
travels from the left towards the right. Since the momentum of the system must
be conserved, the box must recoils to the left as the photon is emitted. At
some later time, the photon collides with the other side of the box,
transferring all of its momentum to the box. The total momentum of the system
is conserved, so the impact causes the box to stop moving.
Unfortunately,
there is a problem. Since no external forces are acting on this system, the
centre of mass must stay in the same location. However, the box has moved. How
can the movement of the box be reconciled with the centre of mass of the system
remaining fixed?
Einstein
resolved this apparent contradiction by proposing that there must be a ‘mass
equivalent’ to the energy of the photon. In other words, the energy of the
photon must be equivalent to a mass moving from left to right in the box.
Furthermore, the mass must be large enough so that the system centre of mass
remains stationary.
Let
us try and think about this experiment mathematically. For the momentum of our
photon, we will use Maxwell’s expression for the momentum of an electromagnetic
wave having a given energy. If the energy of the photon is E and the speed of light is c, then the momentum of the photon is
given by:
(1.1)
The box, of mass M,
will recoil slowly in the opposite direction to the photon with speed v. The momentum of the box is:
(1.2)
The photon will take a short time, Δt, to reach the other side of the
box. In this time, the box will have moved a small distance, Δx. The
speed of the box is therefore given by
(1.3)
By the conservation of momentum, we have
If the box is of length L,
then the time it takes for the photon to reach the other side of the box is
given by:
(1.5)
Substituting into the conservation of momentum equation (1.4) and rearranging:
(1.6)
Now suppose for the time being that the photon has some mass, which we
denote by m. In this case the
centre of mass of the whole system can be calculated.
If the box has position x1
and the photon has position x2, then the centre of mass for the
whole system is:
(1.7)
We require that the centre of mass of the whole system does not
change. Therefore, the centre of mass at the start of the experiment must be
the same as the end of the experiment. Mathematically:
(1.8)
The
photon starts at the left of the box, i.e. x2 = 0. So, by rearranging and simplifying the above
equation, we get:
(1.10)
Rearranging gives the final equation:
So, let’s think about what this equation means. The equation suggests that a given mass can be converted into energy. But how much energy? Well, suppose we have a kilo of mass. Conversion of this mass into pure energy would result in (1kg * c2) joules of energy. Now note that c2 = 8.99 * 1016 m2s-2 so that's a WHOLE lot of energy - equivalent to 21.48 megatons of TNT!
In practice, it is not possible to convert all of the mass into
energy. However, this equation led directly to the development of nuclear
energy and the nuclear bomb - probably the most tangible results of special
relativity.
No comments:
Post a Comment